fedex zone chart 2018 origin form zip code 32805

But I know some people are gonna disagree. The Both Pentacon Six lenses (Carl Zeiss Jena Biometar 80mm f2.8 and the Mir 26b 45mm f3.5) was disappointing.Here are a small cropped area of each test photo, aperture is f11, raw files are unprocessed. I actually heard good things about the Biometar as a good portrait lens and that the Mir was supposed to be very sharp. Mamiya-Sekor C 1: 2.8 f 80mm is a standard lens for medium format cameras of the Mamiya 645 series with a frame size of 6 cm X 4.5 cm (frame diagonal 75 mm, crop factor Kf 0.58). Shooting them wide open both was unusable, stepping them down the Biotar got better but the Mir was still unusable. On narrow-format cameras, of course, it will not show all its charm, but, nevertheless, is suitable for use. All the Pentax lenses disappointed me especially the 6×7 lenses.These lenses are a lot older than the other ones so I guess that’s why. Not only where they a bit more unsharp than the Mamiya lenses but also did they have a lot of chromatic aberration giving this purple fringing around all objects. This test proves it but it was also my experience using the lenses. They are pretty sharp and has a pretty nice image rendition.

Images has this nice magenta tint and good micro contrast. High quality modern lenses are better than these older medium format lenses.A lot of lenses from the 80’s or older has this uncharming look, the Mamiya lenses don’t, not that they look like modern lenses but something in between. Old scanned review of Pentax 645 camera and lenses including lens sharpness test.The Mother of All Lens Tests (big medium format lens test).So only get them if you think it’s fun to use them on modern cameras or if you shoot some medium format film.

Fedex zone chart 2018 origin form zip code 32805